| 
Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders
   
(U.S. Supreme Court)
 
 
Whether sexual harassment is actionable without "tangible employment action"
The Supreme Court 6/14/04 clarified the circumstances under which employers may assert affirmative defenses to Title VII-based claims that a hostile work environment created by a supervisor culminated in constructive discharge.  The Court held that , to establish “constructive discharge,” a plaintiff must show that her work environment was so intolerable that her resignation qualified as a fitting response.  If “constructive discharge” is established, the employer may, consistent with the Court’s 1998 decisions in Ellerth and Faragher, assert affirmative defenses that:  (i) the employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct the harassment, and (ii) the plaintiff unreasonably failed to take advantage of any employer-provided or other opportunities to correct or avoid harm.  If, however, the plaintiff resigned in reasonable response to official employer actions changing her employment status − such as humiliating demotions, cuts in pay, or transfers − then the employer may not assert these affirmative defenses.  This decision is important for all employers subject to Title VII.
       |