Product Liability -- 2018



Miller v. Ford Motor Co.   (Oregon Supreme Court)

Court undermining statute of repose

The NAM filed an amicus brief supporting Ford Motor Company in a lawsuit brought by a plaintiff alleging that a used car was defective because it had an electrical issue more than eleven years after the original sale date. Oregon’s statue of repose declares that a product is non-defective as a matter of law if it remained in use for ten years without showing a defect. However, a lower court determined that this provision allowed for no statute of repose for a product produced in a state without a statute of repose, such as the Ford car at issue. The NAM's brief argues that the Oregon Supreme Court should reverse the lower court’s statute of repose interpretation because it is contrary to legislative intent and has far-reaching negative implications for any manufacturers doing business in Oregon. The Court unfortunately ruled that that when the state of manufacture did not have a statute of repose, then there is no governing statute of repose at all, which makes doing business in Oregon much less attractive for manufacturers.


Related Documents:
NAM brief  (November 16, 2017)

 


© 2019 National Association of Manufacturers